Blog

Analysis on enterprise AI governance, inline policy enforcement, agentic AI security, and regulatory compliance.

AI Governance Platform: The Runtime Enforcement Layer a Documentation Tool Cannot Provide

Most tools sold as AI governance platforms manage policies, risk registers, and model documentation. None of that touches a live AI request. A governance platform that changes outcomes needs a runtime enforcement point, a policy decision point, and an independent audit system of record at the AI request boundary. This walks through those three functions and the evidence they produce for the EU AI Act.

Compliance & Regulationai-governanceai-complianceeu-ai-actpolicy-enforcementaudit
Read post →

MCP Security Best Practices: Authorizing and Auditing Model Context Protocol Traffic

The Model Context Protocol gives an LLM a standard way to call tools, and over HTTP transport those calls are AI traffic you can authorize and audit. This covers the practices that matter at the request boundary: verify identity on every call, scope tools per role, treat tool descriptions as untrusted, fail closed, and log per decision. It also marks the line where local stdio servers fall outside a gateway.

Problem-Awareai-securityagentic-aillm-securitypolicy-enforcementidentity-and-authorization
Read post →

Agentic AI Permission Control: The Delegated-Authority Layer Most Deployments Skip

Most AI agents run on a static credential with standing access to the full model API and every downstream tool. Permission control means evaluating each agent action against who delegated it, under which policy, at that moment. This walks through the delegated-authority model, where standing credentials fail, and the enforcement layer that binds every agent call to a scoped, audited decision.

Problem-Awareagentic-aiai-securityidentity-and-authorizationnist-ai-rmfinline-enforcement
Read post →

AI Bug-Hunting Drove ~1,500 High-Severity CVEs in June 2026: Prioritizing the Patch Window

AI models are now finding software flaws at scale. Epoch AI counted roughly 1,500 high-severity and critical CVEs reported in June 2026, about 3.5x the previous monthly record, while real exploitation still arrives within hours of disclosure. This walks through why patch prioritization by exploitability, plus identity-bound inline policy at the AI request boundary, is the control that holds between disclosure and patch.

Platform & Architectureai-securityllm-securitycybersecurityinline-enforcementarchitecture
Read post →

AI Agent Sandbox: The Runtime Isolation Model That Contains Blast Radius When the Prompt Turns Hostile

An AI agent that executes tool calls, writes files, runs shell commands, and reaches network endpoints from inside the same process as the calling application inherits the caller''s ambient authority. A sandbox around the agent runtime confines that authority so a successful prompt injection cannot escalate beyond what the sandbox permits. This covers the sandbox properties, the process versus container versus VM trade-offs, and the audit signal the sandbox produces at each boundary crossing.

Problem-Awareai-agent-securityagentic-aisandboxruntime-isolationblast-radiusdefense-in-depth
Read post →

LLM Response Content Filter: The Transform Patterns That Convert an Unsafe Answer Into a Safe One Without Blocking the Request

Blocking every unsafe response is the wrong default for many production deployments. A well-scoped response filter transforms the unsafe portion (redacts PII, rewrites competitor mentions, strips prompt-injection payloads intended for downstream systems) and passes the safe remainder through. This covers the transform patterns, where they sit in the streaming response path, and how the audit record differentiates a transform from a block.

AI Security Solutionsllm-response-filterai-securitycontent-filterllm-dlpai-gatewayoutput-filtering
Read post →

AI Request Authorization Model: The Four Predicates Every Production AI Call Has to Answer

Every production AI request has four authorization predicates the enforcement layer has to evaluate: which identity, which model, which data classification, and which organizational policy. Missing any one produces an audit gap the regulator, the SIEM, or the incident-response team surfaces later. This walks through the four predicates, the input attributes each requires, and the policy engine pattern that composes them.

Platform & Architectureai-authorizationai-policy-enforcementai-securityauthorization-modelai-gatewayzero-trust-ai
Read post →

ChatGPT Enterprise Controls: What OpenAI Ships, What Deployers Still Own

ChatGPT Enterprise ships SSO, data-retention controls, audit log export, admin API, SCIM, and the training-data exclusion clause. Those controls satisfy the direct-use surface. When employees copy ChatGPT output into other tools, when internal applications call the OpenAI API with a shared service credential, and when custom GPTs pull data from company systems, the enterprise controls stop at the boundary of the app. This is the boundary map, the ownership split between OpenAI and the deployer, and the additional controls that cover what ChatGPT Enterprise does not.

Comparisons & Alternativeschatgpt-enterpriseopenaiai-securityshadow-aienterprise-controlsai-governance
Read post →

LLM Jailbreak Defense Patterns: The Layered Controls That Survive Real Production Traffic

Model-provider safety training reduces jailbreak success rates but does not eliminate them. Production deployments layer three defenses around the model: input-side classifiers that flag adversarial prompts, output-side classifiers that flag policy-violating responses, and identity-aware policy at the request boundary that limits what a successful jailbreak can accomplish. The layered pattern, the residual failure modes, and the audit record each layer produces.

Problem-Awarellm-jailbreakprompt-injectionai-securitydefense-in-depthai-safetyai-policy-enforcement
Read post →

AI Agent Tool Scoping: The Blast Radius Control That Agent Frameworks Do Not Enforce

AI agent frameworks let the model choose from the tool set the developer registered. What the frameworks do not enforce is which tool the calling identity is authorized to use in which context. When a prompt injection attack succeeds, the blast radius is the intersection of the tool set the framework registered and the authorization the calling application forwarded. Tool scoping is the control that shrinks the intersection.

Problem-Awareai-agent-securityagentic-aiprompt-injectionblast-radiusagent-toolsauthorization
Read post →

AI Agent Observability: The Signals That Turn Autonomous Behavior From a Black Box Into a Debuggable System

Application observability (metrics, logs, traces) misses the signals that matter for AI agents: which tools the agent called, which sub-agent it delegated to, which policy decision permitted or denied each step, how many tokens each decision cost. Autonomous behavior without per-step observability is an unauditable black box. This covers the signals a production agent has to emit, the OpenTelemetry semantic conventions taking shape, and where the AI request boundary fits in the telemetry pipeline.

Platform & Architectureai-agent-observabilityai-agent-securityopentelemetryai-securityagentic-aitraces
Read post →

Policy as Code for AI: The Review Pipeline That Turns AI Policy From a Config Screen Into a Reviewed Artifact

AI policies expressed as configuration screens inside a gateway UI change without version control, without code review, and without a rollback plan. The same policies expressed as code (Rego, Cedar, or JSON schemas checked into git) inherit the review pipeline the rest of the codebase runs on. This covers the operational pattern, the language choices, and how policy-as-code maps to SOC 2 CC8.1, ISO 27001 8.28, and EU AI Act Article 26 change management.

Platform & Architecturepolicy-as-codeai-governanceai-securitydevopscomplianceai-gateway
Read post →