Blog

Analysis on enterprise AI governance, inline policy enforcement, agentic AI security, and regulatory compliance.

America's AI Action Plan: Federal Signals for Enterprise AI Security

America's AI Action Plan is a federal policy agenda built around innovation, infrastructure, and international security. It directs agencies toward procurement changes, AI security guidance, incident-response work, and full-stack export programs. Enterprise teams should track those outputs without mistaking the plan for a private-sector compliance rule. This guide turns the federal actions into a review register with owners, triggers, and evidence.

Compliance & Regulationai-governanceai-securitycybersecuritynistpolicy-enforcementregulation
Read post →

OWASP AI Exchange: Build a Threat-to-Control Ownership Map

The OWASP AI Exchange is a broad, living body of knowledge for AI security and privacy. Security teams get value from it by scoping one deployed system, selecting relevant threats, assigning controls to the components that can enforce them, and retaining test evidence. This guide turns the Exchange into a practical threat-to-control ownership map without mistaking one gateway for complete AI security coverage.

Compliance & Regulationowaspai-securitythreat-modelingai-governancepolicy-enforcementarchitecture
Read post →

Is Zoom AI Companion HIPAA Compliant? A BAA and Feature Review

Zoom AI features can support a HIPAA-regulated workflow when the customer has a Business Associate Agreement with Zoom, the selected AI feature is available under that BAA, and the organization configures and governs the workflow. Availability can vary by feature. This guide separates the contract decision from the customer controls needed before protected health information enters a Zoom AI workflow.

Industry Verticalshipaaai-compliancezoomai-securityphibusiness-associate-agreement
Read post →

Is Perplexity HIPAA Compliant? Verify the BAA and Service Scope

Perplexity publicly describes its Enterprise offering as HIPAA compliant and its security program as using HIPAA-aligned safeguards. Those statements do not replace a signed Business Associate Agreement or identify the exact services and features covered by it. A healthcare organization should keep PHI out until it has the executed BAA, covered-service schedule, account configuration, data-flow map, and customer control evidence for the intended workflow.

Industry Verticalshipaaai-complianceperplexityai-securitypolicy-enforcementaudit
Read post →

Grok Acceptable Use Policy: What Enterprise Teams Must Enforce

The Grok acceptable use policy applies to consumers, developers, and businesses using the service. Its current rules prohibit harmful and illegal activity, service abuse, safeguard circumvention, unauthorized actions, and high-stakes automated decisions. Enterprise customers should translate those provider rules into identity-bound controls on routed API requests, while keeping human review, application actions, and direct consumer use under their proper owners.

Compliance & Regulationacceptable-useai-policygrokai-governancepolicy-enforcementaudit
Read post →

Is Read AI HIPAA Compliant? A Product and BAA Guide

Read AI says it meets HIPAA technical safeguard requirements and makes a Business Associate Agreement available to healthcare and human services teams on request. That supports a HIPAA-regulated deployment only after the organization confirms the agreement, workspace, enabled features, meeting-data routes, retention settings, permissions, and operating evidence. This guide turns the vendor claim into a reviewable approval decision.

Compliance & Regulationhipaaai-complianceai-securityhealthcareauditdata-protection
Read post →

F5 Distributed Cloud Pricing: Packages, Entitlements, and Quote Inputs

F5 Distributed Cloud pricing is quote-led rather than a public dollar rate card. The current package sheet separates Essentials and Enterprise, includes base request and infrastructure entitlements, and marks several controls as add-ons. A defensible estimate starts with package fit, monthly requests, load balancers, CDN transfer, log volume, edge nodes, and advanced security services.

Comparisons & Alternativesai-securitycloud-securityarchitecturepolicy-enforcementdata-loss-prevention
Read post →

Membership Inference Attacks: The Privacy Signal Hidden in Model Responses

A membership inference attack uses model behavior to estimate whether a specific record appeared in the training data. The privacy harm can exist even when the model reveals no record fields, because membership in a hospital, benefits, or disciplinary dataset can itself disclose sensitive information. This article separates training-time mitigations from the query controls available at an authenticated HTTP model boundary.

Problem-Awareai-securityllm-securitydata-loss-preventionidentity-and-authorizationpolicy-enforcementaudit
Read post →

LLM Load Balancing Needs Policy-Aware Routing

LLM load balancing distributes eligible requests across deployments according to health, capacity, latency, and rate-limit state. The eligibility step comes first: identity, data classification, residency, and model authorization must remove forbidden destinations before an operational algorithm chooses among the remaining endpoints.

Platform & Architecturellmarchitecturecloud-securityinline-enforcementpolicy-enforcement
Read post →

Model Scanning Catches Dangerous Artifacts Before They Load

Model scanning inspects serialized ML artifacts before a runtime loads them. A useful gate identifies executable payloads, unsafe deserialization paths, suspicious imports, and format-specific risk, then preserves the scan result beside the artifact digest. It covers the model supply chain. Runtime authorization still needs a separate control on live LLM traffic.

Platform & Architectureai-securityllm-securityarchitecturedevsecopspolicy-enforcement
Read post →

LiteLLM vs Portkey: Choose the Operating Model First

LiteLLM and Portkey both place a common API in front of model providers, yet they create different operating responsibilities. LiteLLM gives platform teams an open-source SDK and a self-hosted gateway they can run as infrastructure. Portkey, now presented as Prisma AIRS AI Gateway, combines gateway routing with an observability and administration surface. The decision starts with who will own the control plane, its data stores, and its evidence.

Comparisons & Alternativesai-securityllm-securityarchitecturepolicy-enforcementcloud-security
Read post →

Does ChatGPT Train on Your Data? The Product Boundary

ChatGPT data use depends on the product and workspace. OpenAI may use content from individual services for model training unless the user opts out. ChatGPT Business, Enterprise, Edu, Healthcare, Teachers, and the API are excluded from training by default. Training settings, retention, memory, and access controls remain separate decisions. This guide maps those boundaries and shows what an enterprise must verify before employees send company data.

Problem-Awareai-securityai-governanceshadow-aidata-loss-preventionpolicy-enforcement
Read post →