Blog

Analysis on enterprise AI governance, inline policy enforcement, agentic AI security, and regulatory compliance.

AI Security for Finance Back Office: The Identity, Data, and Audit Controls a Production Deployment Has To Run

Finance back-office copilots reach across the GL, the close calendar, the vendor master, and the pre-announcement earnings detail. The data the copilot reads at request time crosses MNPI thresholds, vendor confidentiality contracts, and SOX 302 attestation territory. This piece walks through the identity-aware policy decisions a finance back-office deployment has to commit at the request boundary, the audit record format that survives SOX and SEC review, and the architectural pattern that closes the gap.

Industry Verticalsfinance-back-officemnpisoxai-securityidentity-awareaudit-logs
Read post →

ChatGPT Prompt Injection: How the Attack Surfaces in Enterprise ChatGPT Deployments

ChatGPT prompt injection attacks reach enterprise deployments through three vectors: the Custom GPT instruction-leak surface, the file-upload indirect injection path, and the connected-tool authorization gap that ChatGPT Enterprise opens through GPT actions. This piece walks through each vector, the failure mode the model alone cannot close, and the request-boundary control that produces a deterministic decision and an audit record EU AI Act Article 12 reviewers will accept.

Problem-Awareprompt-injectionllm-securityai-securityshadow-aiinline-enforcementaudit
Read post →

Best AI Security Tools 2026: The Categories That Cover Different Layers and How To Choose

The "best AI security tools" list looks different in 2026 because the EU AI Act, Fannie Mae LL-2026-04, and DORA changed what regulated buyers actually need. The category splits into five product shapes covering different layers of the AI request path. This piece walks through each category, the obligation it closes, the failure mode that disqualifies a vendor in the category, and the fit pattern for a regulated stack.

Comparisons & Alternativesai-securityvendor-evaluationprocurementeu-ai-actai-governancecompliance
Read post →

AI Security Vendor Evaluation Criteria: The Twelve Questions That Distinguish Real Enforcement from Marketing

AI security vendor evaluation criteria for 2026 cluster around twelve concrete questions tied to EU AI Act Article 12, Fannie Mae LL-2026-04, and NIST AI RMF Manage 4 obligations. Each question maps to an architectural property a real enforcement layer either has or does not. This piece walks through the twelve questions in the order a regulated buyer should ask them, the answer pattern that indicates the vendor sits at the request boundary, and the failure modes that distinguish marketing copy from production architecture.

Comparisons & Alternativesai-securityvendor-evaluationprocurementeu-ai-actaudit-logscompliance
Read post →

How to Prevent Prompt Injection: The Four Control Layers That Hold Up in Production

Prompt injection prevention splits into four control layers: prompt construction discipline, retrieval-time content evaluation, request-boundary policy enforcement, and post-response output checks. The first two are application work. The third sits in the inspection layer at the HTTP path between the application and the model. This piece walks through what each layer can and cannot prevent, and the architectural pattern that produces a defensible posture under EU AI Act Article 12 and OWASP LLM01 review.

Problem-Awareprompt-injectionllm-securityai-securityinline-enforcementpolicy-enforcementowasp
Read post →

Gemini Prompt Injection: The Workspace Integration Surface and the Inspection Layer Response

Gemini prompt injection reaches enterprise deployments through three surfaces that the consumer discussion rarely covers: the Workspace integration path where Gemini reads Gmail, Drive, and Calendar content into the model context, the Gemini API file and URL inputs, and the Vertex AI authorization gap when Gemini is wired into enterprise tools. This piece walks through each surface, the model defenses that fall short, and the request-boundary controls that produce a defensible audit record.

Problem-Awareprompt-injectionllm-securityai-securityinline-enforcementauditshadow-ai
Read post →

Claude Prompt Injection: Where the Constitutional AI Defense Falls Short of Enterprise Policy

Claude prompt injection attacks reach enterprise deployments through Anthropic Computer Use, the Files API indirect injection surface, and the MCP connector authorization gap that the Claude developer platform opens. Constitutional AI reduces compliance with the simpler payloads. The training does not enforce the enterprise policy, the user role, or the data classification rules that apply inside a specific organization. This piece walks through each surface and the inspection-layer controls that produce a defensible posture.

Problem-Awareprompt-injectionllm-securityai-securityagentic-aiinline-enforcementaudit
Read post →

Prompt Injection Test Cases: The Twelve Patterns Your Red Team Has To Run

Prompt injection test cases for production AI deployments cluster into twelve patterns the red team has to exercise: instruction-override, role-reversal, encoded payloads, indirect injection through retrieved content, tool-output injection, multi-turn persuasion, authority impersonation, output-formatting hijack, translation pivot, long-context dilution, system-prompt extraction, and authorization-bypass. This piece walks through each pattern, the payload structure, the expected inspection-layer verdict, and the audit record the test should produce.

Problem-Awareprompt-injectionllm-securityai-securityinline-enforcementred-teamaudit
Read post →

Prompt Injection Mitigation Techniques: The Eight Controls That Hold Up Under Review

Prompt injection mitigation in production AI deployments splits into eight controls: prompt structure, input classifiers, retrieval-time content evaluation, identity-bound policy enforcement, output classifiers, tool call authorization, conversation-aware state checks, and per-decision audit records. This piece walks through what each control catches, what each one misses, and the architectural layer where each fires. The pattern that holds up under EU AI Act Article 12 and DORA Article 19 review.

Problem-Awareprompt-injectionllm-securityai-securityinline-enforcementpolicy-enforcementaudit
Read post →

Prompt Injection Attack Examples: Ten Production Payloads and the Request-Boundary Response

Prompt injection attack examples in production AI systems cluster into ten repeatable payload families. Each one targets a specific gap between the application instructions and the model context window. This piece walks through the payload, the failure mode the attacker exploits, and the request-boundary response that produces a deterministic block decision and an audit record an EU AI Act Article 12 or DORA Article 19 reviewer will accept.

Problem-Awareprompt-injectionllm-securityai-securityinline-enforcementauditowasp
Read post →

Prompt Injection vs Jailbreak: Where the Two Attack Classes Diverge and What the Inspection Layer Enforces

Prompt injection and jailbreaking are distinct attack classes that public discussion often conflates. Jailbreaking targets the model provider safety training to produce content the provider intended to suppress. Prompt injection targets the application context boundary to override the application instructions or exfiltrate organization data. The defenses sit at different architectural layers. This piece walks through the distinction, where each defense layer fires, and the inspection-layer pattern that addresses both.

Problem-Awareprompt-injectionllm-securityai-securityinline-enforcementmodel-guardrailsaudit
Read post →

AI Security for Product Analytics: The Inspection Layer Between the Analyst Prompt and the Customer Data Warehouse

Product analytics teams have moved a significant share of exploration onto LLMs. The analyst asks a natural-language question and the LLM emits SQL that runs against the customer data warehouse. The boundary between the analyst identity, the prompt, the generated SQL, and the warehouse result set is where the security and audit obligations sit. This piece walks through the request-time data an analyst LLM workflow reads, the identity-aware policy decisions the deployment has to commit, the audit record format that satisfies EU AI Act Article 12 and GDPR Article 22, and the architectural pattern that closes the post-authentication gap.

Problem-Awareproduct-analyticsanalyst-llmai-securityidentity-awareaudit-logsinline-enforcement
Read post →