Blog

Analysis on enterprise AI governance, inline policy enforcement, agentic AI security, and regulatory compliance.

AI Agent Identity Governance: Setting Policy for Which Agents Exist and What They May Do

Agent identity governance is the policy layer that decides which AI agents may exist, what each is scoped to touch, and how an organization proves that oversight to an auditor. This walks through the lifecycle (provisioning, scoping, deprovisioning), the gap between policy on paper and enforcement at the request line, and how the discipline maps to the NIST three-pillar model, EU AI Act Article 12, and ISO/IEC 42001.

Compliance & Regulationai-governanceidentity-and-authorizationagentic-ainisteu-ai-actcomplianceaudit
Read post →

AI Agent Context Window Poisoning: How a Single Bad Retrieval Steers an Entire Session

An AI agent runs in a context window: the system prompt, the user request, the retrieved documents, the prior tool calls, and the prior model responses. The window is the model''s working memory for the session. Context window poisoning is the attack pattern where attacker-controlled content lands in the window and steers the model''s subsequent decisions. A single bad retrieval can alter the model''s behavior for the rest of the session. This article walks the attack vectors, the detection signals at the gateway, the redaction patterns that prevent the poison from reaching the model, and the audit record that supports investigation.

Problem-Awareagentic-aicontext-poisoningprompt-injectionai-securityrag-securityagent-security
Read post →

LiteLLM Alternatives: 9 Proxy and Gateway Options in 2026

Nine LiteLLM alternatives for 2026, grouped by the job each one performs: enterprise API governance, routed model access, edge observability, self-hosted AI platforms and agent-traffic controls. The comparison separates LiteLLM’s Python SDK from its Proxy Server and identifies the policy, identity and audit evidence each option provides.

Comparisons & Alternativesai-gatewaycomparisonllm-securityai-securityarchitecturepolicy-enforcement
Read post →

When Outbound AI Touches Customer Data: Security Context for Lemlist-Style Sales AI Stacks

Sales outreach platforms like Lemlist, Outreach, Apollo, and Smartlead now embed AI features that consume CRM and customer data to draft messages and personalize sequences. The security question is not which platform has the cleanest UI. It is where the AI traffic exits the enterprise boundary, what data leaves with it, and who holds the audit record. The architectural answer is upstream of the platform choice.

Comparisons & Alternativesshadow-aisales-aiembedded-aiai-governanceb2b-saasaudit
Read post →

DeepEval Alternatives: Four LLM Evaluation Options and Where Each Fits

DeepEval is the pytest-native, open-source standard for scoring LLM outputs in CI, and teams outgrow it in different directions: hosted dashboards, managed red-teaming, or a broader testing scan. This lays out four alternatives, Promptfoo, Giskard, Patronus AI, and Braintrust, plus where a runtime enforcement layer sits, with honest notes on what each one is built to do.

Comparisons & Alternativesllm-securitycomparisonllm-evaluationai-securityauditpolicy-enforcement
Read post →

EBA ICT Guidelines AI Controls Mapping After DORA

This EBA ICT Guidelines AI controls mapping uses the amended, post-DORA text rather than the original 2019 control set. It maps the remaining payment service user relationship requirements to objectives, owners, AI implementation points, tests, evidence, and coverage limits. The result keeps customer communications and LLM traffic distinct from payment execution and notification controls.

Industry Verticalsai-governanceai-compliancecomplianceregulationdorapolicy-enforcementaudit
Read post →

EBA ICT Guidelines AI Compliance Checklist After DORA

This EBA ICT Guidelines AI compliance checklist begins with the post-DORA applicability fork. The amended Guidelines now focus on payment service user relationship management, while DORA governs the broader ICT risk framework. Use the checks to grade AI security guidance, customer controls, alerts, support, evidence integrity, and the boundary between LLM traffic and payment systems.

Industry Verticalsai-governanceai-compliancecomplianceregulationdorapolicy-enforcement
Read post →

EBA ICT Guidelines AI Audit Evidence After the DORA Scope Change

The EBA narrowed its ICT and security risk management Guidelines after DORA began to apply. For AI used in payment-service customer interactions, the remaining evidence question concerns security guidance, customer choices, alerts, updates, and support. This guide builds an audit package around that current scope while separating runtime AI records from adjacent payment controls.

Industry Verticalsai-governanceai-compliancecomplianceregulationdoraaudit
Read post →

COPPA AI audit evidence for sampling, retrieval, and integrity

COPPA AI audit evidence should let an assessor reconstruct which child-facing data flows existed, how consent and parental requests were handled, and which safeguards operated. This guide separates population sampling, record retrieval, integrity checks, and the bounded evidence available at a routed LLM request.

Industry Verticalsai-complianceregulationauditforensic-auditpolicy-enforcement
Read post →

CJIS AI Controls Mapping: Requirements at the Authenticated LLM Boundary

This CJIS AI controls mapping connects selected access, information-flow, identity, and audit requirements to an implementation point, owner, test, evidence artifact, and explicit boundary. It shows where an HTTP AI gateway contributes direct or partial coverage and where IAM, records, operations, endpoints, and incident teams remain responsible.

Industry Verticalsai-complianceai-governancearchitecturecjispolicy-enforcementpublic-sector
Read post →

CJIS AI Compliance Checklist: Owners, Evidence, and Pass Conditions

This CJIS AI compliance checklist converts policy requirements into actions with named owners, evidence artifacts, and pass conditions. It covers scope, authentication, information flow, event content, review, reporting, integrity, search, retention, and boundary ownership for AI requests that may handle criminal justice information.

Industry Verticalsai-complianceai-governancechecklistcjispublic-sectorzero-trust
Read post →