AI Governance Gap Analysis.
Turn ad-hoc AI usage into a governed, auditable program.
The problem
You’re using AI. But do you have policies? Defined roles and responsibilities? A complete inventory of AI systems? Risk classifications? Audit trails? For most organizations, the answer to every one of those questions is no.
AI governance isn’t about slowing innovation down — it’s about scaling without liability. Regulators and enterprise customers expect documented governance, and absence of it shows up first as deal friction and later as fines.
What’s included
What you get
Who this is for
Methodology
Stakeholder interviews across leadership, security, legal, and engineering. AI system inventory. Current state documentation.
Gap assessment against NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, and industry-specific requirements. Per-system risk classification.
Gap matrix, governance framework, policy recommendations, 30/60/90-day roadmap, and an executive presentation for leadership and the board.
FAQ
NIST AI RMF as a baseline, mapped against ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, and any industry-specific requirements relevant to the engagement, customized to your context.
No. We work with organizations that have no existing program and provide an honest assessment of where you stand today.
Traditional IT audits focus on infrastructure, access controls, and network security. AI governance adds entirely new dimensions: model risk management, data provenance, algorithmic accountability, bias monitoring, and AI-specific regulations.
Yes. The deliverables provide a strong foundation and a clear roadmap toward certification readiness.
We recommend at least a lightweight assessment first. Policies written without understanding your current state tend to be generic and hard to implement.
Book a 30-minute call to discuss where your organization stands and what a governance foundation looks like.